His title is actually a really clever bit of misdirection, isn't it? He uses "Nano" to describe the device, then gets away with keyword spamming so that it will show up in searches for an Apple iPod Nano by including what would seem to be a "genuine" Apple part for it. The cheek!
However, what he can and should be stopped for is more basic: every picture in the auction is lifted from Apple and then photoshopped. The screen is not a consistent size, and I'm sure the touchwheel is not identical to an iPod, or ti would draw a lawsuit from Apple.
Speaking of the images, they have two different watermarks on them. Neither is "matsfactory". That alone could be used to cause issues for him. I can't read the owner, but I'm sure even among scammers, stealing images can get someone in trouble...
__________________
My two iPods are jealous of my two MPx players.
|